AI资讯大全AIPPXP.CN搜索 ↗
AI 快讯 · 自动更新

3 fired OpenAI researchers send open letter saying company practices could trigger 'chilling effect'3 名遭解雇 OpenAI 研究员发公开信,称公司做法或引发“寒蝉效应”

IT House, Oct. 9 (Xinhua) -- Three former OpenAI researchers, Mikita Ballesney, Tomek Kolbak and Jasmine Wang, who were abruptly fired last week, released an open letter today (Oct. 9). In the letter, it was mentioned that it was feared that this would deter other employees from expressing their opinions publicly, and that Ope...

IT之家 10 月 9 日消息,上周突然被解雇的 OpenAI 三名前研究人员米基塔 · 巴莱斯尼、托梅克 · 科尔巴克和贾斯敏 · 王今天(9 日)发表公开信。信中提到,担心此举会让其他员工不敢公开表达意见,对 Ope…

2026年10月9日 发布 · 2 分钟阅读 · 免费

Key Points要点速览

IT House, Oct. 9 (Xinhua) -- Three former OpenAI researchers, Mikita Ballesney, Tomek Kolbak and Jasmine Wang, who were abruptly fired last week, released an open letter today (Oct. 9). The letter mentions fears that the move will discourage other employees from expressing their opinions publicly, creating a “chilling effect” on OpenAI's corporate culture. In an open letter titled “OpenAI Can't Secure AI Alone,” the trio noted that OpenAI is “not an ordinary company” and that the ability of employees to work with external agencies to address security issues with confidence is an important part of OpenAI's working culture. The open letter was posted on social media by Barlesnee, who had previously been engaged in AI alignment research, to the safety committees of OpenAI. The other two signatories, Kolbak and Jasmine Wang, both previously engaged in AI security research, were also fired. According to Business Insider, an OpenAI spokesperson responded that the company had concluded after an internal investigation that the three had violated rules on access to and handling of sensitive information. The three researchers said on social media that the company only verbally informed them of the reason for the dismissal, and their previous actions were within their respective job responsibilities. Jasmine Wang was accused of accessing an email from an executive in response to which she said: “The reason given by the company for the dismissal is simply untenable. Ballesny posted that the company told him it no longer trusted him because he was“ communicating too much with third-party security agencies. ”" I have never disclosed the company's intellectual property information to the outside world. My work has been coordinated with my immediate supervisors, the management of the research department, and the board of directors. Kolbak also posted that the company had verbally informed him that the reason for his dismissal was “the way he communicated with METR.” “I want to make it clear that communicating with METR is my job." IT House Note: METR is a non-profit research organization responsible for assessing AI models and their security risks. In the open letter, the three expressed concern that other employees may not dare to express their opinions and work as before, which was an indispensable part of OpenAI's work until last week. “Sudden layoffs like ours, and the rush to notify the parties involved, have left the culture of openness that OpenAI used to be proud of impacted by the chilling effect. The three also made three recommendations to OpenAI: allow third-party security auditors to enter the company, ensure that cutting-edge AI models can still be effectively monitored, and support security researchers to maintain “open and transparent communication” with other institutions and personnel in the field of AI security. In an internal memo to employees, a Head of Research at OpenAI expressed strong support for the three recommendations. “We are very grateful for their contributions to AI security work, as well as their courage to speak up and question existing perspectives. We value their opinions, support their work, and have great trust in them. I must be clear that the dismissal decision has nothing to do with them raising safety concerns or speaking out publicly. Employees are always encouraged to express their opinions and will continue to do so. We don't fire employees for raising concerns. Kolbak also wrote on social media that he was concerned that OpenAI would use the dismissal of three people as an“ excuse ”to reduce its cooperation with METR.

中文

IT之家 10 月 9 日消息,上周突然被解雇的 OpenAI 三名前研究人员米基塔 · 巴莱斯尼、托梅克 · 科尔巴克和贾斯敏 · 王今天(9 日)发表公开信。信中提到,担心此举会让其他员工不敢公开表达意见,对 OpenAI 的企业文化产生“寒蝉效应”。 三人在题为《OpenAI 无法独自确保 AI 安全》的公开信中指出, OpenAI“不是一家普通公司” ,员工能够放心地与外部机构合作解决安全问题,是 OpenAI 工作文化的重要组成部分。 公开信由此前从事 AI 对齐研究的巴莱斯尼发布在社交媒体上,收信人为 OpenAI 的各安全委员会。另外两名署名者科尔巴克和贾斯敏 · 王此前均从事 AI 安全研究,同样遭到解雇。 据《商业内幕》报道,OpenAI 发言人回应称,公司经过内部调查,认定三人 违反了敏感信息访问和处理规定 。 三名研究人员则分别在社交媒体上称,公司只口头告知了他们解雇原因,而他们此前的行为均属于各自的工作职责范围。 贾斯敏 · 王被指访问了一位高管的电子邮件,对此回应称:“公司给出的解雇理由根本站不住脚。” 巴莱斯尼发帖称,公司告诉他,因为他“与第三方安全机构交流过多”,所以不再信任他。“我从未对外泄露公司的知识产权信息。我的工作一直与直属上级、研究部门管理层和董事会保持协调。” 科尔巴克也发帖称,公司曾口头告知他,解雇原因是他“与 METR 沟通的方式”。“我要说清楚,与 METR 沟通本来就是我的工作。” IT之家注:METR 是一家负责评估 AI 模型及其安全风险的非营利研究机构。 、 三人在公开信中担忧,其他员工今后可能 不敢再像以前那样发表意见、开展工作 ,而这些直到上周都是 OpenAI 工作中不可缺少的一部分。“像我们这样突然解雇员工,又如此仓促地通知当事人,让 OpenAI 过去引以为傲的开放文化受到了寒蝉效应的冲击。” 三人还向 OpenAI 提出三项建议:允许第三方安全审计人员进驻公司,确保前沿 AI 模型仍可受到有效监测,并支持安全研究人员与 AI 安全领域其他机构和人员 保持“公开、透明的交流” 。 OpenAI 一名研究部门负责人在发给员工的内部备忘录中,对三项建议表达了强烈支持。“我们非常感谢他们对 AI 安全工作的贡献,也感谢他们 敢于直言、质疑现有观点 。我们重视他们的意见,支持他们的工作,对他们给予了极大的信任。我必须明确一点,解雇决定 与他们提出安全问题或公开发声无关 。我们始终鼓励员工表达意见,今后也会如此。我们不会因为员工提出担忧就解雇他们。” 科尔巴克还在社交媒体上写道,他担心 OpenAI 会以三人遭解雇为“借口”,减少与 METR 的合作。

读完接着看 · Keep reading

想马上用起来?去「AI工具」栏挑一个直接下载,或在「AI教程」里跟着图文步骤做一遍。

去 AI工具 → 看 AI教程 →
0阅读0 条评论

阅读与点赞数据保存在你的浏览器本地,欢迎留下你的想法。

评论 文明发言,让讨论更有价值

正能量公益广告今日正能量学一点,用一点;今天种下的种子,会长成明天的能力。去免费下载专区 →广告